Tuesday, October 1, 2013

theatlantic: No, Iran Doesn’t Need Assad As opponents of a...

http://hollars.tumblr.com/post/60344466566
theatlantic:

No, Iran Doesn’t Need Assad

As opponents of a...


theatlantic:



No, Iran Doesn’t Need Assad



As opponents of a strike against Syria scramble to find alternative avenues for a peaceful solution, there is one murky diplomatic route, rarely mentioned, which now seems more necessary than ever to explore: talking to Iran.


Contrary to conventional wisdom, Iran’s support for Bashar al-Assad is neither unconditional nor everlasting. Despite having assisted the Assad regime from the beginning of the conflict with weapons and personnel, the war in Syria has not strengthened Iran, which likely wants to get out of the Syrian quagmire as soon as possible — if it can do so with some influence in Syria intact.


First of all, the war has created a regional image problem for the clerics in Tehran. Since its 1979 Islamic Revolution, Iran has strived to be a beacon for the downtrodden people of the Muslim world and a standard-bearer against what it sees as oppression by America in the region. Assad’s carnage against fellow Muslims makes Iran look really bad on the Arab street, where Iran tried hard to make the Arab Spring look like a logical extension of its own revolution.


Read more. [Image: Khaled al-Hariri/Reuters]


No comments:

Post a Comment